Welcome to the RonaldReagan.com Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   RonaldReagan.com Forums > Reagan's Peers > Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum)

Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) A Current Events Forum Dedicated To Our 43rd President - George W. Bush.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 12-10-2002, 06:28 PM
The Finman's Avatar
The Finman The Finman is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,649
Rep Power: 50
The Finman has disabled reputation
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Angry

Quote:
<h2><font color=#003399>Selective Moral Outrage </font></h2>
By Mark R. Levin

On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, Bill Clinton traveled to Fayetteville, Arkansas to honor the life of the late Arkansas senator, J. William Fulbright by dedicating a seven-foot-tall bronze statue of the man.

According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "The $100,000 sculpture is the final [expenditure] of an $850,000 fundraising campaign for a project to honor Fulbright.

Among other things, Clinton said, "If [Fulbright] were here today, I'm sure he would caution us not to be too utopian in our expectations, but rather utopian in our values and vision."

And back on May 5, 1993, in what the Washington Post characterized as a "...

moving 88th birthday ceremony for former senator William Fulbright, President Clinton last night bestowed the Presidential Medal of Freedom on the man he described as a visionary humanitarian, a steadfast supporter of the values of education, and 'my mentor.'" Clinton added, "It doesn't take long to live a life.

He made the best of his, and helped us to have a better chance to make the best of ours....The American political system produced this remarkable man, and my state did, and I'm real proud of it."

Of course, the man Clinton was praising, who he called his "mentor," who supposedly embraced utopian values and made the world a better place for everyone, was also a rabid segregationist.

In 1956, Fulbright was one of 19 senators who issued a statement entitled the "Southern Manifesto."

This document condemned the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v.

Its signers stated, among other things, that "We commend the motives of those States which have declared the intention to resist forced integration by any lawful means."

They stated further, "We pledge ourselves to use all lawful means to bring about reversal of this decision which is contrary to the Constitution and to prevent the use of force in its implementation."

Of course, in 1957, the first serious challenge to Brown occurred in Fulbright's backyard.

Fulbright's Democrat colleague, Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus (another early Clinton backer) ordered the National Guard to surround Central High School in Little Rock to prevent nine black students from attending the school.

President Dwight Eisenhower dispatched the 101st Airborne Division to protect these teenagers and enforce the Supreme Court's decision.

Fulbright later voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

He voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Now, given the turmoil surrounding Trent Lott's foolish statement last week about Strom Thurmond's 1948 presidential campaign, you'd think there would have been at least some outcry when Bill Clinton lionized Fulbright a mere six weeks ago, or when he awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1993.

But there was nothing in the Washington Post admonishing Clinton, which today published a scathing editorial against Lott.

There was no criticism in the New York Times, which today is running a vicious column by Paul Krugman implying that Lott is an overt racist.

And while I'm on the subject, I don't remember some of the conservatives now voicing outrage at Lott holding Clinton to the same standard either in 1993 or October of this year.

Nor am I making excuses for Strom Thurmond's past.

Full Story <font color="red"><u>Here</u></font>
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great Mark Levin Site Hane The Rush Room 9 07-21-2005 07:47 PM
Mark Levin on C-Span 2 Liberty Rancho del Cielo (General Forum) 1 05-22-2005 04:31 PM
If you can, turn on Mark Levin now Hane Liberalism Vs. Conservatism (Debate Forum) 5 09-02-2004 08:17 PM
It’s Not All About Lott - By Mark R.Levin The Finman Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) 0 12-18-2002 12:05 AM
Selective Moral Outrage, Part II - Why Only Be Outraged at Lott’s Remarks? The Finman Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) 4 12-15-2002 02:09 PM


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:49 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RonaldReagan.com is the property of Techsure LLC ©1996-2008


 
Page generated in 0.09399 seconds with 11 queries