Yes I love him.

[Liberty]

The only reason why the thinking appears so "far right" to you is because your thinking is so "far left".

Thankfully there is liberalism and far-left fanatics out there to counter all this. We'd all be working the rest of our lives for minimum wage at the nearest McDonald's or Walmart, our wives and children included if the Republicans did not have an opposition to their radical (and well disguised) agenda.

Yes. Given your demonstrative level of intelligence so far, I'd have to agree. I doubt you could handle any job of real substance or be able to successfully run your own.

[leechk23]

And a reply to the terrorism guy. Please stop saying we have never seen the likes of terrorsim. It has been around since the beginning of time and terrorists have been staging and planning attacks against the USA since at least the 70's. It just happened that there most successful attack occured while there was a Republican in office, who could not resist the opportunity to beat up the war drums and after having absolutely no reaction to the news of the bombings did not waste his golden "Political" opportunity to stand there and say were gonna get those responsible. Give me a break!!

[leechk23]

I see that now it's all about personal attacks. That is intelligent as well.

[JohnnyYuma]

Originally posted by leechk23:
I see that now it's all about personal attacks. That is intelligent as well.

You are the one coming here spouting mindless drivel ... politics is all personal ....

[Liberty]

And a reply to the terrorism guy. Please stop saying we have never seen the likes of terrorsim. It has been around since the beginning of time and terrorists have been staging and planning attacks against the USA since at least the 70's.

Since at least the 1970's? Geez. You really are an ignorant fool.

It just happened that there most successful attack occured while there was a Republican in office,.....

You mean the one that was planned since the 1990's who's leader was allowed to walk away by Clinton?

.... who could not resist the opportunity to beat up the war drums....

Uh...they declared war first back in 1996, nitwit. I know you would have prefered that we just bend over and grab our ankles when something like that happens, but most of us aren't that gay.

...and after having absolutely no reaction to the news of the bombings did not waste his golden "Political" opportunity to stand there and say were gonna get those responsible.

What bombings? The last time there were any bombing were when Clinton was in office. Geez, what an idiot. All he did was send a million dollar missle into a empty tent and blow up a camel. And lets not forget the nightwatchman he killed at an aspirin factory!

Give me a break!!

Which leg?

.

[Liberty]

Originally posted by leechk23:
I see that now it's all about personal attacks. That is intelligent as well.

Oh. Its nothing personal. I just call them as I see them.

.

[leechk23]

Well it's been fun having these insightful discussions with ya'all, but I will leave it at that. I really don't like trying to argue with irrational hot heads whom offer nothing but hot air without real substance. OK, technically not a bomb, but what would you call it? It was a plane used as a bomb, (who's the idiot here?). I guess Clinton was the only President not to do anything about terrorists? However, they didn't level the trade centers when he was in office, but we can blame him, I really didn't care to much for him either. You should bend over and grab your ankles, it sounds like you have practice. And about the 70's part if you know something you would like to say, just say it.

[Liberty]

Well it's been fun having these insightful discussions with ya'all, but I will leave it at that.

Please don't tell me that is all you've got. I'm disappointed.

I really don't like trying to argue with irrational hot heads whom offer nothing but hot air without real substance.

Well, seeing as how everything you've said has already been thoroughly discredited, you don't give us much choice. You've offered no evidence to support your claims.

OK, technically not a bomb, but what would you call it? It was a plane used as a bomb, (who's the idiot here?).

You still are apparently. One WW2 term would be "kamikazi". No bombs were involved so that still means you're an idiot.

I guess Clinton was the only President not to do anything about terrorists?

No. Clinton did do something as I've already pointed out. He blew up an aspirin factory and a camel. Quite an effective deterrent against terrorist wouldn't you say?

However, they didn't level the trade centers when he was in office,...

Lucky thing, huh.

....but we can blame him,...

Based on your standards, yes.

...I really didn't care to much for him either.

Backtracking, eh? Can't blame you for that.

You should bend over and grab your ankles, it sounds like you have practice.

Every April 15th, thank you Democrats.

And about the 70's part if you know something you would like to say, just say it.

Oh, I know lots of things. You would to if you ever made an effort to educate yourself.

.

[leechk23]

And Liberty, it's good to know that your concerned about the empty tent and the camel Clinton killed. And lets not forget the nightwatchman he killed at an aspirin factory! He didn't get over 2,000 Americans killed trying to Democratize the Middle East though.

[Hane]

Posted by our latest nose picking, dim witted, skanky troll:

(who's the idiot here?).

Umm...Without question, the five posts you've made here so far say it all.

I guess your question is rhetorical. [img]graemlins/Laughing.gif[/img]

Jackass.