Quote:
|
You'll find similar things at most international airports (for fire training...
|
Even a cursory glance tells one that this is NOT an airport. There is no trace of a runway or taxiway. The plane was brought there from elsewhere. It did not land there.
Quote:
|
...and at military sites (for hostage rescue training).
|
Or in this case, for hostage-taking.
Quote:
|
If this is such a top secret issue why the hell do you think they got the thing parked at a known satellite target for all the world to see ?
|
I repeat: naive. Where the hell are they going to park it in a land that's 99% sand so that a satellite CAN'T spot it?
Look at the damn thing. It's totally out of place there. It's like finding the Queen Mary in an inland lake. This is a "known" terrorist training camp. What better place is there for it to be? Basrah International Airport, perhaps?
Quote:
|
The simple fact is that these photos prove precisely nothing-contrary to the claim at the top of this page.
|
Perhaps you'd be so kind as to share your dazzling teenage insight with all the military and political experts who are of the mistaken conviction that a civilian airliner in a known terrorist training facility represents evidence that they train terrorists to hijack airplanes.
Quote:
|
It may well be exactly what you say it is.It may not be.
|
It's not what WE say. It's what the people who are experts in such matters say.
The images are reduced versions of photos taken by the Ikonos commercial photography satellite (go
here to see what Ikonos can do). Would you care to guess what the US government has for photos from its surveillance satellites such as the KH-12 Keyhole that can resolve ground objects down to six inches (some sites give a lower figure than that)? And that's from the satellites that they admit exist.
If you believe that the involved governments are relying for their intelligence on those photos, let me tell you about some land that I own in Florida.
Quote:
|
Naive ? Yeah,right-whatever you say guys.
|
We call 'em as we see 'em.