Welcome to the RonaldReagan.com Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   RonaldReagan.com Forums > Reagan's Peers > Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum)

Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) A Current Events Forum Dedicated To Our 43rd President - George W. Bush.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2003, 10:25 AM
Simply Emo Simply Emo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 713
Simply Emo is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Quote:
WASHINGTON — The Senate voted overwhelmingly Thursday to ban a procedure that critics call partial birth abortion, a triumph for President Bush and the Republicans who took control of Congress this year.

The 65-32 vote sent the legislation to the GOP-controlled House, where passage is expected this spring.

The lopsided roll call was a marked contrast to three days of emotionally-charged debate in which supporters of the bill attacked the controversial procedure as barbaric and opponents said the measure was the opening he Senate floor. Abortion opponents have been working for eight years to put the ban into law, and with a sympathetic president in the White House, are likely to succeed within a matter of weeks or months.

Abortion rights supporters have pledged a court challenge. "This bill is unconstitutional," argued Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., citing the lack of an exemption in cases where the health of the mother is in jeopardy.

The bill prohibits doctors from committing an "overt act" designed to kill a partially delivered fetus. Partial birth is described as a case in which the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the event of a breech delivery, if "any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother."

The legislation includes an exemption in cases in which the procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother.

The debate over the measure reflected hardened political lines on abortion, an issue that Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., said was dividing America as deeply as slavery did in the 19th century. The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that women had the right to an abortion.

For much of the time since, abortion rights supporters have had enough support in Congress or the White House to fend off most attempts to restrict the rights the court identified in its 1973 ruling.

But beginning in 1995, abortion opponents have focused their efforts on the partial-birth procedure, putting their political foes on the defensive.

Congress twice before passed legislation to impose a ban, but former President Clinton vetoed both measures. A third attempt was sidetracked in 2000 when the Supreme Court invalidated a Nebraska state law that closely resembled the measure moving through the House and Senate. Yet a fourth attempt failed last year when Democrats, then in control of the Senate, refused to schedule a vote.

Abortion rights advocates scored one victory on Wednesday when the Senate voted 52-46 in support of the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that gave women the right to end their pregnancies.

Article Continued Here!
Woooooooooooo Hoooooooooooo!
  #2  
Old 03-13-2003, 10:28 AM
CatKozTX CatKozTX is offline
U.S. President
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,283
Rep Power: 672
CatKozTX is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

I am thrilled and thankful for this vote, but at the same time am saddened and disheartened by the 32 that opposed it. Where do we go for a list of the opposing voters? I hope they post it somewhere publicly for all to see.

I'm willing to bet most of the ones that are for partial birth abortion are the same ones against the war in Iraq.

I think a little letter writing is in order here people. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
  #3  
Old 03-13-2003, 10:37 AM
Simply Emo Simply Emo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 713
Simply Emo is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Quote:
Originally posted by CatKozTX:
...at the same time am saddened and disheartened by the 32 that opposed it...
Well; think of it many democrats showed a shred of human decency towards the future of Amercia *snickers* [img]graemlins/angel.gif[/img]
  #4  
Old 03-13-2003, 12:37 PM
Jendetta Jendetta is offline
Gipper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 541
Jendetta is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Quote:
Originally posted by CatKozTX:
I am thrilled and thankful for this vote, but at the same time am saddened and disheartened by the 32 that opposed it. Where do we go for a list of the opposing voters? I hope they post it somewhere publicly for all to see.

I'm willing to bet most of the ones that are for partial birth abortion are the same ones against the war in Iraq.

I think a little letter writing is in order here people. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 108th Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate


Vote Summary

Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 3 As Amended )
Vote Number: 51 Vote Date: March 13, 2003, 09:45 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Bill Passed
Measure Number: S. 3 (Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 )
Measure Title: A bill to prohibit the procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion.
Vote Counts: YEAs 64
NAYs 33
Not Voting


NAYs ---33
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Chafee (R-RI)
Clinton (D-NY)
Collins (R-ME)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (D-FL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 3
*snicker* (political cowards)
Biden (D-DE)
Edwards (D-NC)
Kerry (D-MA)
__________________
<a href=\"http://abortiondebate.org/forums\" target=\"_blank\">AbortionDebate.org</a><br /><a href=\"http://conservababes.com/forums\" target=\"_blank\">Conservababes.com</a>
  #5  
Old 03-13-2003, 03:29 PM
Simply Emo Simply Emo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 713
Simply Emo is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Quote:
Originally posted by Jendetta:
Not Voting - 3
*snicker* (political cowards)
Biden (D-DE)
Edwards (D-NC)
Kerry (D-MA)
OH LORD! That is just two sweet; some wimps, I mean Democrat Presidential hopefuls don't want to tread to close to losing their primaries... [img]tongue.gif[/img]
  #6  
Old 03-13-2003, 03:33 PM
CatKozTX CatKozTX is offline
U.S. President
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,283
Rep Power: 672
CatKozTX is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

I was thinking the same thing Quantum!

Good old Hillary - she makes me seriously ill! That woman doesn't have a single moral principal, does she?
  #7  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:01 AM
NRA FOREVER NRA FOREVER is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,594
Rep Power: 0
NRA FOREVER is on a distinguished road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Its a step in the right direction,hopefully someday we can pack the courts with enough conservative judges to end the evil of abortion for good.
  #8  
Old 03-14-2003, 01:33 AM
DoctorDoom's Avatar
DoctorDoom DoctorDoom is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,095
Rep Power: 3703
DoctorDoom has disabled reputation
AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Unhappy

Step 1 is complete. Maybe in time there will be no more need for these heart-ripping images of Baby Choice.

<center><a href="http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/abortionimages/index.htm" target="_blank">

</a></center>
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Upheld! MathGirl Coulter's Corner 10 04-19-2007 06:36 PM
FINAL ANALYSIS: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 mike27183 Coulter's Corner 65 01-06-2004 06:36 PM
Text of GWB's Partial Birth Abortion Ban Bill Signing Ceremony Angus McGee Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) 0 11-10-2003 01:02 PM
FINAL ANALYSIS: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 mike27183 Liberalism Vs. Conservatism (Debate Forum) 1 10-29-2003 11:03 AM
Help Pass the Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003! hilemanhouse Dubya's Domain (Current Events & News Forum) 2 04-25-2003 08:48 PM


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:42 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RonaldReagan.com is the property of Techsure LLC ©1996-2008


 
Page generated in 0.11365 seconds with 10 queries