|
|
Welcome to the RonaldReagan.com Forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
| Kudlow on Capitalism Economic Forum Headed up by Chief CNBC Economist Lawrence Kudlow |

11-09-2003, 06:49 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,650
Rep Power: 50
|
|
Quote:
<h2><font color=#003399>Another Reagan-Thatcher Moment</font></h2>
Is there an English-speaking interest-rate hike sweeping the world? More important, will English-speaking economic growth principles rule the waves? Most likely, both are correct.
The Reserve Bank of Australia raised its policy rate a quarter of a percentage point this week, and the venerable Bank of England quickly followed suit.
These precautionary moves to maintain price stability actually caused stock markets to rally in both countries.
It doesn't always happen, but U.S. rates frequently follow British rates.
And while interest-rate futures are suggesting a Fed rate hike next winter, the Fed should follow rising real interest rates as economic growth, investment returns and jobs rapidly pick up steam in the Bush boom.
Freedom-loving Great Britain and Australia were of significant help to the United States in ridding the world of Saddam Hussein and fighting the global war on terrorism.
This is why Australian unemployment is an enviable 5.6 percent.
And in Britain, Finance Minister Gordon Brown has been teeing off on European Union (EU) bureaucrats for being completely wrong on growth policies.
While year-to-date gold prices in U.S. dollar terms have increased 10 percent -- indicating a looser monetary policy -- Euro gold is essentially unchanged on the year, despite the fact that the European economy is in worse shape than America's.
Filling out this strong position on growth, both Brown and Prime Minister Tony Blair have flatly told the European Union that Britain will never enter the Eurozone if English tax-and-welfare and labor-market regulations have to be harmonized with the European Union.
The Margaret Thatcher legacy has given the United Kingdom a much more pro-growth tax-rate structure and an environment of social-service spending restraint.
This is why unemployment in Europe is about 9 percent, while British unemployment is 5.9 percent.
At a recent media breakfast in New York City, EU president Romano Prodi criticized an op-ed in the Financial Times co-authored by the prime ministers of Britain and Estonia.
In the piece, the two leaders argued strenuously for competitive tax and budget policies as a means of exerting pro-growth policy pressures on "old Europe."
But Prodi labeled this "unfair competition," and insisted on harmonization among tax and welfare policies.
The free-market English-speaking world, with economic policies that are still to this day driven primarily by Reagan-Thatcher capitalist principles, has persistently outgrown Europe over the past 20 years.
The latter is stuck in a big-government central-planning time warp that favors income leveling over entrepreneurship and maintains deep bootprints on all manner of private enterprise.
The 10 new Eastern European countries recently liberated from Stalinism are scheduled to enter the European Union soon.
Their low-cost, free-market incentivized economies will pose strong competition to old Europe's stodgy state-planning.
Full Article <font color="red"><u>Here</u></font>
|
|

11-09-2003, 09:26 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,171
Rep Power: 29209
|
|
|
An excellent read, there. I'll keep saying it, what doofus out there actually votes to raise their own taxes? Who buys it when someone like Carter says Americans will just have to lower their expectations for the future?
|

11-09-2003, 11:38 PM
|
|
Screen Actors Guild President
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 530
|
|
|
hmmm, I thought England was more socialist than us and had higher taxes and universal healthcare and all those wacko stuff. [img]graemlins/ohwell.gif[/img]
|

11-09-2003, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,171
Rep Power: 29209
|
|
|
They're more socialist than us, but less than Sweden.
|

11-10-2003, 02:05 AM
|
|
Screen Actors Guild President
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 530
|
|
|
But still, taxes are high, and theres little inscentive to create businesses there. Sweden is socialist. Completely 100% all out socialist, those people are weird, so you cant compare 'em. The way Kudlow describes the 'English speaking nations', one would think they are all complete 100% Adam Smith style capitalists.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|
|