Ann's Concern about the "Liberals" Bailout of the Fairness Doctrine!

[NeverCryWolf]

Dear Fellow Conservative,
Last night, I had a horrible dream... and no, this isn't the famous "I Had a Dream" speech. Frankly, I think that one could use a rest.
No, in my dream it was 12 noon, so naturally I tuned in for my daily dose of conservative news and commentary from the greatest political talk show host in the history of radio.
As I imagined one half of a giant brain being tied behind a familiar back, just to make it fair, the familiar bass notes from "My City Was Gone" throbbed, and the announcer's voice boomed...
"Ladies and gentleman... in accordance with Fairness Doctrine broadcasting regulations... here's AL FRANKEN!"
I woke up screaming. But then I realized it was just a bad dream.
Or was it?
The next big "bailout" planned by Obama, Reid, Pelosi and pals is... THE BAILOUT OF LIBERAL TALK RADIO.
Conservative talk radio drives liberals crazy -- or, rather, it drives them crazier. They think it's unfair that more people want to listen to conservative talk radio than to liberal talk radio.
Sure, conservative radio hosts have a built-in audience unavailable to liberals: people in cars on their way to some sort of job. We "crazy right-wingers" call that a competitive environment. Liberals hate that kind of environment - because they lose.
Enter the "Fairness Doctrine," the most Orwellian name since "Barack Obama's Department Of Defense."
What do they mean by "fairness?"
To liberals, "fairness" means that the government will require radio stations that broadcast popular talk radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity Mike Gallagher and Mark Levin to also carry unpopular talk show hosts, known as "liberals."

As I write in my new book, "Guilty: Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America":

By requiring that any political views disseminated over the airwaves be counterbalanced by the opposing view, the Fairness Doctrine not only requires radio stations to give boring crackpots airtime, but it creates a conceptual and administrative nightmare. What is fair? There are conservative and liberal views -- but there are also libertarian, Green party, Federalist and Marxist views. (Though the liberals will tend to have the Marxist arguments covered.) The problem isn't just the paperwork stations have to fill out. It's also that radio stations would have to start balancing three hours of Rush Limbaugh (20 million listeners) with three hours of Randi Rhodes (6 listeners) every day. Re-implementation of the Fairness Doctrine spells the end of talk radio.

This is how liberals "compete" - they outlaw competition.
In case you're wondering, "fairness" does not mean I get equal time with Whoopi Goldberg on The View. Or that Brit Hume gets equal time to rebut the imbecilic Bill Moyers on PBS.
No. Liberals believe the government is required to enforce "fairness" only in the case of talk radio. The TV networks, movie studios, newspapers, news magazines and book publishing houses would continue to be dominated by liberals. I guess 90 percent liberal control is "fair."
By contrast, "fairness" is sorely lacking in the vastly competitive medium such as radio, where conservatives triumph solely because of the free choice of the consumer. Monopolistic industries dominated by liberals do not need to be made more "fair" by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

What can you do now...

What can you do to help fight this shameless assault on the radio programs we cherish?
Thankfully, my colleagues at Human Events are just finishing a special investigative report entitled "The 'Unfairness Doctrine': The Frightening Liberal Attempt to Silence Conservative America." We need to help them distribute this special report to activists, leaders, opinion shapers across the country... and to do so quickly!
Human Events will deliver the report to policy shapers on Capitol Hill, opinion makers at major media outlets, student leaders on college campuses, and to Americans who need to know the truth about this liberal threat to our First Amendment rights.
But we need your help to cover the costs of sounding the alarm, and in doing the ongoing editorial work that sets Human Events apart from other publications.
The folks at Human Events have taken the lead in such battles before. Against "Hillarycare," wasteful spending, and amnesty for illegal immigrants - and much more. And with your help, they've won.
And believe me, this is as big as any of those battles. Unless we defeat the Fairness Doctrine, conservative speech may be finished in America. There will be no alternative voice to the Democratic White House, Senate and House of Representatives. The pendulum may never swing back.
We can't wait until inauguration day to take up the fight. It will be too late. When Time magazine responded to Obama's election by comparing him to Jesus Christ, we got a taste of how the "watchdog" media intended to watch the next president: Far from watchdogs, they're more like love struck puppies.
The mainstream media won't mention the "Fairness Doctrine" - they would prefer to slip it by us in the dark of night.
If you believe talk radio is vital to free and open political speech in a world of liberal-dominated news media...
If you believe that Democrat control of Washington does not bestow the right to replace Rush Limbaugh with Al Franken...
Then I urge you to join up with HUMAN EVENTS in their offensive against this threat. They can't win this fight without your help.

Any amount you send is greatly appreciated. To express their gratitude for your donation of just $75 or more, Human Events will send you, along with your special report, an autographed gift copy of my hard-hitting, soon-to-be-released book, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and their Assault on America. Liberals will be so upset by my analysis of how they have turned our country into "Guilt, Inc." -- where "success" is now defined by "achieving" victim status -- that I expect they will soon try to ban books, but only after they deal with talk radio.
Liberals are doing everything in their power to silence Rush, Sean, Mike, Mark and the others. I urge you to join Human Events to save our civil liberties.
Best Regards,

Ann Coulter
P.S. Barack Obama says he won't reintroduce the "Fairness Doctrine." But here's the thing, he won't have to... Madame Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, will do it for him! Can we really trust him to rebuff a Democrat Congress' efforts to censor talk radio? This is why Human Events needs your help now. Please make as a generous contribution as you can, and send it today.

I am not endorsing Human Events here, but I am endorsing Ann's underlying message for the Liberals to try and end the outlets of the Conservative Voice is totally UnAmerican .... Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Wolf

[NeverCryWolf]

I just wanted to bring this issue to attention one more time ... as a lot of our favorite Conservative Talk hosts may succumb to this potential doctrine.

Ann, has been a strong Activist for our side lately, working her heart out.

God bless Ann, and her motivation (and her good looks).

Please, I would like to know about your thoughts on this potentially lethal legislation that could kill a great percentage of the "Conservative Voice" being heard.

Thanks,
Wolf

[Saugussam]

God bless Ann - she always makes it impossible for the Left to debate. She brings it every time and it drives them nuts. It is not that she does not give people a chance - just the opposite. She uses her laser sharp mind, trained at Cornell, in law, in research to fairly debate what the Left does not want contested. I notice she does not get invited on The View. Matt 'Lite' Lauer tries but cannot bring rational thought to the game.

Ann is a light.

I have said it before, the women that worked in R2's administration were spoiled for ever working for or loving lesser men. Ann is one. She must lament that there is not a man for her that can hold a candle to her old boss.

[Warhawk1982]

She was on The View once, but she hasn't been invited back since.

[X1776kRumor]

Originally Posted by Warhawk1982

She was on The View once, but she hasn't been invited back since.

Ann Coulter was on "The View" on Jan 12, 2009 to discuss her book Guilty.
Whoopi Goldberg, took a real exception to Ann's statements, but Ann simply pointed out that statics backed what she had written. Below is a one clip (3 of 4) of Ann's appearance. They really need a moderator on the View, whereby the moderator cuts-off the microphones of those who start interrupting and ranting.

[NeverCryWolf]

I watched a little bit of her Interview on Larry King last night, but I can't remember the name of the older red headed liberal that was filling in for Larry, (maybe cause I don't care to remember the names of liberals anymore), and Ann was constantly interrupted, and at times almost scorned.

As usual, though, she held her own!

Gotta love Ann,
Wolf

[Warhawk1982]

That's the liberals last line of defense of their clearly idiotic ideals. They rant, interrupt, and basically just over-talk anybody with a different view from their own. A merely tame version of the hard-core communists they wish to emulate.

[NeverCryWolf]

Hawk, I always love your posts that are short and to the point!

I, personally, believe that there isn't a Liberal/progressive that could personally take Ann on in a one on one debate and win!

Ann is awesome!

Wolf

[jnr mom]

Ann is great.. regardless of the situation, she never backs down... You gotta love that.

[Warhawk1982]

Originally Posted by NeverCryWolf

Hawk, I always love your posts that are short and to the point!

I, personally, believe that there isn't a Liberal/progressive that could personally take Ann on in a one on one debate and win!

Ann is awesome!

Wolf

'Preciate it Wolf. I try not to be long winded. Plus I'm too lazy to type a bunch of stuff. Anyway, Ann has this way of driving liberals nuts and like I said they try to shut her out by interrupting her and not letting her get in a word edgewise. They'd might as well put their fingers in their ears and go "LALALALALALALA I can't hear you, LALALALALALALA!!!". And how about those so-called "facts" they always bring up? What a joke.